Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘salvation’

Reason #3 – The terms of the contract between God and Israel in the context of Ezekiel 18 refer to physical punishment.

The phrase “house of Israel” occurs 140 times in the Old Testament.  In the Book of Ezekiel, we find this phrase an amazing 79 times!

Here are the occurrences in Ezekiel 18:

(Ezekiel 18:6)  And hath not eaten upon the mountains, neither hath lifted up his eyes to the idols of the house of Israel, neither hath defiled his neighbour’s wife, neither hath come near to a menstruous woman,

(Ezekiel 18:15)  That hath not eaten upon the mountains, neither hath lifted up his eyes to the idols of the house of Israel, hath not defiled his neighbour’s wife,

(Ezekiel 18:25)  Yet ye say, The way of the Lord is not equal. Hear now, O house of Israel; Is not my way equal? are not your ways unequal?

(Ezekiel 18:29)  Yet saith the house of Israel, The way of the Lord is not equal. O house of Israel, are not my ways equal? are not your ways unequal?

(Ezekiel 18:30)  Therefore I will judge you, O house of Israel, every one according to his ways, saith the Lord GOD. Repent, and turn yourselves from all your transgressions; so iniquity shall not be your ruin.

(Ezekiel 18:31)  Cast away from you all your transgressions, whereby ye have transgressed; and make you a new heart and a new spirit: for why will ye die, O house of Israel?

This is a prophetic book about a nation – the house of Israel!

Terms of the Contract = Physical

Ezekiel is a book about the consequences of a broken contract between Jehovah and Israel and the restoration of the nation.  In Leviticus 26, a series of blessings and curses upon the nation Israel are laid out in orderly fashion.  Verses 1 through 13 detail the blessings while verses 14 through 39 list the curses.  These are conditional blessings and curses.  Israel contracted to receive them based on her performance in obedience or disobedience to the commandments of God. Israel’s heart as God’s chosen people turned against God.  The curses, given in five separate courses, turn out to be a prophetic history of the nation.  Ezekiel’s ministry occurred in the beginning of the 5th course of punishment.  This is THE KEY to understanding why Ezekiel prophesied such condemnation against Israel.  Ezekiel prophesied the details of the curses Israel agreed to in her contract with God!

God uses Ezekiel the priest (Ezek 1:3) to prophesy using the contract found in Leviticus, the book of the priesthood.  Leviticus is a book about God’s holiness.  Ezekiel is a book about Israel’s ungodliness.  Leviticus presents a sacrificial system which outwardly demonstrates an inward communion between God and His people.  Ezekiel condemns the nation because their sacrifices are a false manifestation of broken communion.

The curses in Leviticus 26 do not reveal individual condemnation for failure to perform the Law.  It’s important to remember these punishments resulted from a corporate agreement between Jehovah and Israel.  While there were certainly righteous individuals in the nation at any given time, Israel as a whole continued to prove they were a hard-hearted and disobedient people.  Just as the four courses of punishment are given in a series of cumulative installments, the fifth course of punishment itself is in cumulative installments.  Without going into much more detail, here are just a few examples of the parallels between Leviticus 26 and the prophecy of Ezekiel.

Prophecy

Leviticus 26

Ezekiel’s Prophecy

Famine (Leviticus 26:26)  And when I have broken the staff of your bread, ten women shall bake your bread in one oven, and they shall deliver you your bread again by weight: and ye shall eat, and not be satisfied. (Ezekiel 4:16)  Moreover he said unto me, Son of man, behold, I will break the staff of bread in Jerusalem: and they shall eat bread by weight, and with care; and they shall drink water by measure, and with astonishment:
Cannibalism (Leviticus 26:29)  And ye shall eat the flesh of your sons, and the flesh of your daughters shall ye eat. (Ezekiel 5:10)  Therefore the fathers shall eat the sons in the midst of thee, and the sons shall eat their fathers; and I will execute judgments in thee, and the whole remnant of thee will I scatter into all the winds.
Slain men’s carcases laid upon the destroyed idols (Leviticus 26:30)  And I will destroy your high places, and cut down your images, and cast your carcases upon the carcases of your idols, and my soul shall abhor you. (Ezekiel 6:13)  Then shall ye know that I am the LORD, when their slain men shall be among their idols round about their altars, upon every high hill, in all the tops of the mountains, and under every green tree, and under every thick oak, the place where they did offer sweet savour to all their idols.
Cities laid waste, idolatrous temples destroyed, refusal to accept offerings (Leviticus 26:31)  And I will make your cities waste, and bring your sanctuaries unto desolation, and I will not smell the savour of your sweet odours. (Ezekiel 6:6)  In all your dwellingplaces the cities shall be laid waste, and the high places shall be desolate; that your altars may be laid waste and made desolate, and your idols may be broken and cease, and your images may be cut down, and your works may be abolished.
Judgment in a foreign land (Leviticus 26:33)  And I will scatter you among the heathen, and will draw out a sword after you: and your land shall be desolate, and your cities waste. (Ezekiel 5:2)  Thou shalt burn with fire a third part in the midst of the city, when the days of the siege are fulfilled: and thou shalt take a third part, and smite about it with a knife: and a third part thou shalt scatter in the wind; and I will draw out a sword after them.

(Ezekiel 12:14)  And I will scatter toward every wind all that are about him to help him, and all his bands; and I will draw out the sword after them.[1]

The Book of Ezekiel is about a nation (Israel) who broke her vows to Jehovah in the contract she agreed to fulfill and was destined to destruction as a result.

(Leviticus 26:46)  “These are the statutes and judgments and laws, which the LORD made between him and the children of Israel in mount Sinai by the hand of Moses.”

In the chapters leading up to Ezekiel 18 and those immediately after, page after page is filled with promises of physical destruction because of Israel’s disobedience to her covenant vows.  The wrath of Jehovah has already been executed in some course, but much still remained as Ezekiel penned the book.

But, just as Leviticus 26 concludes with the promise of restoration with repentance in verses 40-45, Ezekiel also looks forward to the time when Jehovah Himself will fulfill the promises that Israel could never keep.  There will be restoration and blessing because Jehovah’s mercy and grace will replace the blind attempt of a sinful nation to maintain a righteous standing before Him.  This is the context of the book of Ezekiel, including chapter 18.

Therefore, we must keep in mind the contractual blessings and curses in Ezekiel are physical in nature as a result of a physical contract with physical consequences.  It is recommended the Bible student go back to Leviticus 26 to find anything except physical blessings and cursing promised.  Throughout history, this is the way the Lord manifested Himself to His nation.


[1] In all four OT occurrences of the phrase “draw out the sword” (here, Ezek 5:2, 12; 12:14), it is preceded by the use of “scatter” and it is always a reference to Israel.  It is in three other passages but always in reference to the judgment of a nation outside Israel (Egypt: Exod 15:9, Ezek 30:11; Tyre: Ezek 28:7).

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

Reason #2 – “Soul” in Ezekiel refers to the whole person, not just the spirit of man, and so does not refer to eternal death.

Those who wrongly assume “death” means spiritual death in Ezekiel 18, make the same wrong assumption where the “soul” is mentioned.  An erroneous understanding is built from the first assumption.  It is reasoned that if this passage presents spiritual life and death, then the word “soul” must be the part of man subject to spiritual life and death.  And if works play a part in this spiritual life and death, then it is reasoned this must confirm works play a part in the salvation of Old Testament people.  Here it is presented in another way.

Assumption #3 Works leading to life or death must be the Old Testament plan of salvation
Assumption #2 “Soul” must be the part of man subject to spiritual death
Assumption #1 “Death” must be spiritual

This reasoning is a “house of cards.”  Once it is understood that Ezekiel 18 refers to physical life and death (Assumption #1), then it is easy to understand why the works produced in the context of this passage have nothing to do with justification unto eternal life.

By necessity, those who see the passage in terms of spiritual life and death believe the word “soul” must refer to the second part of man’s trichotomy (spirit, soul, body – cp. 1 Thessalonians 5:23) or a combination of soul and spirit.  However, once again, this forces a meaning on the passage without consideration of the context.  The Hebrew word “nephesh” is often, but not always, translated into the English word “soul.”  It is used in a variety of contexts in the Old Testament.  Here are a few examples of places where it is translated “soul” in the Old Testament.

In some places it refers to the individual man.

(Exodus 1:5)  “And all the souls that came out of the loins of Jacob were seventy souls: for Joseph was in Egypt already.”

(Exodus 12:4)  “And if the household be too little for the lamb, let him and his neighbour next unto his house take it according to the number of the souls; every man according to his eating shall make your count for the lamb.”

(Ezekiel 13:18)  “And say, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Woe to the women that sew pillows to all armholes, and make kerchiefs upon the head of every stature to hunt souls! Will ye hunt the souls of my people, and will ye save the souls alive that come unto you?”

In other places, it is translated “soul” where man exercises certain powers or performs certain actions.

(Genesis 27:4)  “And make me savoury meat, such as I love, and bring it to me, that I may eat; that my soul may bless thee before I die.”

(1 Samuel 1:26)  “And she said, Oh my lord, as thy soul liveth, my lord, I am the woman that stood by thee here, praying unto the LORD.”

(Ezekiel 4:14)  “Then said I, Ah Lord GOD! behold, my soul hath not been polluted: for from my youth up even till now have I not eaten of that which dieth of itself, or is torn in pieces; neither came there abominable flesh into my mouth.”

And yet in other places, “nephesh” is translated “soul” to refer to mortal man, subject to physical death, salvation, and prolonged life.

(Genesis 12:13)  “Say, I pray thee, thou art my sister: that it may be well with me for thy sake; and my soul shall live because of thee.”

  • Notice Abraham’s soul referred to his physical life in this context.

(1 Samuel 24:11)  “Moreover, my father, see, yea, see the skirt of thy robe in my hand: for in that I cut off the skirt of thy robe, and killed thee not, know thou and see that there is neither evil nor transgression in mine hand, and I have not sinned against thee; yet thou huntest my soul to take it.”

  • Notice David is referred to his physical life.

(Ezekiel 18:27)  “Again, when the wicked man turneth away from his wickedness that he hath committed, and doeth that which is lawful and right, he shall save his soul alive.”

  • Notice it is the wicked man who turns away from his wickedness that saves his soul alive.

It is entirely consistent with the system of physical promises and physical punishments given to the nation Israel for death of the “soul” in Ezekiel 18 to mean physical death.  Even if one would like to take the contrary position, there is little if not less evidence, to support the concept of “soul” being the part of man subject to spiritual death in this context.

Read Full Post »

(In the previous post, I laid out six reasons why “the soul that sinneth” does not concern spiritual death.  In the next several posts, I am going to go into detail concerning each reason.  I apologize in advance for the length of this post.  I thought about splitting this up into two or three separate posts but thought it better to just leave the information together for continuity of thought sake.  Yes, I am aware how much this violates the intent of the blogosphere!  Thanks for your indulgence.)

Reason #1 – “Death” In Ezekiel Means Physical Death, Not Spiritual Death

Those who believe people Old Testament saints were justified unto eternal life by keeping the Law make the assumption that the subject of dying and death in Ezekiel 18 refers to spiritual death.  But this is a huge assumption and an even bigger presumption on the passage.  First, it must not be assumed spiritual death is in view just because the words “soul,” “sin,” and “dieth” occur together.  Secondly, it is presumptuous to take the doctrine we understand today as spiritual death and force it on the understanding and situation of the Old Testament people in this passage.  Grave error occurs when passages are interpreted out of context both historically and dispensationally.

In the King James Version, the word “die” is used 30 times in Ezekiel.  Let’s look at a few instances where this occurs and see if we can understand the meaning of the passages, specifically Ezekiel 18.

The Death of the Wicked Is Literal, Physical Death

(Ezekiel 3:18)  “When I say unto the wicked, Thou shalt surely die; and thou givest him not warning, nor speakest to warn the wicked from his wicked way, to save his life; the same wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at thine hand.”

  • Who is the wicked? Ezekiel 3:17 tells us the Lord is talking about the “house of Israel.”

(Ezekiel 3:17)  Son of man, I have made thee a watchman unto the house of Israel: therefore hear the word at my mouth, and give them warning from me.

Question:  Is “…house of Israel” referring to an individual or a nation?

Answer:  It should be obvious the context, like most warnings in Ezekiel, is national in scope.

  • Why are they considered “wicked?” Ezekiel 3:7 tells us, “…for all the house of Israel are impudent and hardhearted.”
  • According to this verse, when the wicked dies, there is bloodshed. There are only two ways to interpret this – spiritually or literally. If the watchman does not warn the wicked (the disobedient house of Israel), the watchman will be held accountable. This is the principle laid out in Genesis 9.

(Genesis 9:5-6)  “And surely your blood of your lives will I require; at the hand of every beast will I require it, and at the hand of man; at the hand of every man’s brother will I require the life of man.  Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.”

The bloodshed refers to the taking of physical life.

  • Conclusion: This is a warning to the prophet. He must fulfill his duty to warn the house of Israel of their wicked ways and the coming physical consequences. Otherwise, he (the prophet) will be held accountable for the deaths of his fellow Israelites. The accountability is literal, the shedding of the blood of the wicked is literal, and thus the death of the wicked is literal.

Dying “In Iniquity” Is Physical Punishment

(Ezekiel 3:19)  “Yet if thou warn the wicked, and he turn not from his wickedness, nor from his wicked way, he shall die in his iniquity; but thou hast delivered thy soul.”

  • What does “thou has delivered thy soul” mean in this context? There are two possible interpretations:
    • This is a passage on soul salvation. By warning the wicked of the coming judgment of God, Ezekiel himself as the watchman gains justification unto eternal life. If he fails to warn the wicked, he is condemned to eternal damnation.
    • The literal interpretation is: By warning the wicked, Ezekiel will deliver his soul from something. What is the something? It is the resulting guilt and accountability of not warning the wicked.
  • A comparison passage is found in chapter 14. For the sake of brevity, we won’t exposit all the pertinent verses. Here are just a few to help us get the point:

(Ezekiel 14:17-20)  Or if I bring a sword upon that land, and say, Sword, go through the land; so that I cut off man and beast from it:  Though these three men were in it, as I live, saith the Lord GOD, they shall deliver neither sons nor daughters, but they only shall be delivered themselves. Or if I send a pestilence into that land, and pour out my fury upon it in blood, to cut off from it man and beast:  Though Noah, Daniel, and Job, were in it, as I live, saith the Lord GOD, they shall deliver neither son nor daughter; they shall but deliver their own souls by their righteousness.

  • The sword comes upon the land – physical punishment
  • Man and beast will be cut off from it. What is “it?” It = the land, not eternal death. “Cut off” from the land. In other words, a figure of speech for physical death. Looked at another way – If this was eternal death, why would “beast” be mentioned?
  • The three men refer back to Noah, Daniel, and Job (verse 14). What shall they be delivered from? “A sword” as we saw in verse 17. This is deliverance from physical punishment.
  • Pestilence = physical punishment
  • Blood = a euphemism for death as seen again in the cutting off of man and beast.
  • “Deliver their own souls” = must refer back to the salvation from the physical punishment in verse 19 (pestilence and blood).

Conclusion:  Once again the passage concerns physical death.  Spiritual death is not in view.

Pointing Back to Context

(Ezekiel 3:20)  Again, When a righteous man doth turn from his righteousness, and commit iniquity, and I lay a stumblingblock before him, he shall die: because thou hast not given him warning, he shall die in his sin, and his righteousness which he hath done shall not be remembered; but his blood will I require at thine hand.

In case you didn’t notice, the first two examples were from verses adjacent to one another.  Now, in Ezekiel 3:20, let’s ask the question once again – Is the context in this passage physical death or spiritual death? Notice the Lord says “Again” to let us know He is continuing the thought of the previous verses – the context is physical punishment, not spiritual.

Additionally, the word “deliver” is used 16 times in the book of Ezekiel and each time it refers to something physical occurring.  Check it out in: Ezekiel 7:19, Ezekiel 11:9, Ezekiel 13:21, Ezekiel 13:23, Ezekiel 14:14, Ezekiel 14:16, Ezekiel 14:18, Ezekiel 14:20, Ezekiel 21:31, Ezekiel 23:28, Ezekiel 25:4, Ezekiel 25:7, Ezekiel 33:5, Ezekiel 33:12, Ezekiel 34:10, Ezekiel 34:12

A Few More Considerations

For the sake of saving time (and space!) here are some of the other verses that contain the word “die”:  Ezekiel 5:12, Ezekiel 6:12, Ezekiel 7:15, Ezekiel 12:13, and:

(Ezekiel 13:19)  “And will ye pollute me among my people for handfuls of barley and for pieces of bread, to slay the souls that should not die, and to save the souls alive that should not live, by your lying to my people that hear your lies?”

  • Here is an indictment against the false prophetesses in Israel. If the death in this verse is spiritual death:
    • The false prophetesses had the power to condemn innocent people to eternity without God.
    • The false prophetesses had the power to deliver those who were guilty unto eternal life.

Obviously, this was not the case and this verse refers to physical death and physical life.

  • The terminology in this verse also occurs in similar fashion in a comparison verse in Ezekiel 18!

(Ezekiel 18:27)  “Again, when the wicked man turneth away from his wickedness that he hath committed, and doeth that which is lawful and right, he shall save his soul alive.”

The phrase in Ezekiel 13 “save the souls alive” refers to physical life, and the phrase “save his soul alive” refers to physical life.  In Ezekiel 13 it is the unrepentant and untruthfulness that causes the death of the innocent.  In Ezekiel 18, it is the change of mind and the obeying of the truth that saves life of the repentant.  This is a consistent use of the phrase.

Here is a list of verses with the word “die” in Ezekiel except those in chapter 18.  Ezekiel 17:16, Ezekiel 28:8, Ezekiel 28:10, Ezekiel 33:8, Ezekiel 33:9, Ezekiel 33:11, Ezekiel 33:13, Ezekiel 33:14, Ezekiel 33:15, Ezekiel 33:18, Ezekiel 33:27

An honest study would reveal these verses refer to physical punishment, not eternal death in Hell.  So far, we’ve considered every verse in Ezekiel except those in chapter 18.  If the verses in this one chapter do concern eternal life and death, then this chapter stands out as the great exception in the entire 48 chapters of Ezekiel!

So you can study it on your own, here are the rest of the verses that contain the word “die” in Ezekiel:   Ezekiel 18:4, Ezekiel 18:13, Ezekiel 18:17, Ezekiel 18:18, Ezekiel 18:20, Ezekiel 18:21, Ezekiel 18:23, Ezekiel 18:24, Ezekiel 18:26, Ezekiel 18:28, Ezekiel 18:31

Conclusions

1)      In Ezekiel, “the death of the wicked” refers to physical death.

2)      In Ezekiel, to “die in iniquity” refers to physical death.

3)      In Ezekiel, when a soul is “delivered,” refers to physical deliverance.

Once again, it must be stated that the interpretation of spiritual death in Ezekiel 18 assumes a meaning on the passage without taking into account the context of the passage or the entire Book of Ezekiel.  There is no comparison passage in Ezekiel that supports the conclusion that life and death should be interpreted as spiritual rather than physical.

Read Full Post »

Maybe the questions raised and answered in this article have always been swirling around me and I just missed them.  Maybe my sensitivity to these issues is more acute now than in the past.  Recently, the subject of salvation from the debt and penalty of sin for the Old Testament saint has been addressed in conversations, forums and sermons.  A passage brought up to me on several occasions is Ezekiel Chapter 18.  The basic question to consider is, “Does Ezekiel 18 prove that God required individuals in the Old Testament to demonstrate their faith by works of righteousness in order to be acceptable to Him?”  In order to narrow down the passage, this article will address this question based on two verses used to “prove” that God accepted the Old Testament saint on the basis of works rooted in faith.

Ezekiel 18:4 – “Behold, all souls are mine; as the soul of the father, so also the soul of the son is mine: the soul that sinneth, it shall die.”

Ezekiel 18:20 – “The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.”

(For the purpose of this article, I make no distinction between the terms “faith plus works” and “faith that works.”  “Faith that works” is a term recently invented.  It describes the viewpoint that Old Testament saints’ faith must be demonstrated (through works of righteousness) in order to be righteous with God.  Essentially, this is “faith plus works” by another name.)

Read Full Post »

I apologize for taking so long to get this uploaded.  I had to do some editing and formatting.  There are some minor changes between the posts on this blog and the article version in order to make it more conducive to print publication.  Thanks for your patience and I hope you enjoy it.

Old Testament Salvation and The Rich Young Ruler

Read Full Post »

(This is the final post in this series.  I am somewhat torn because there is so much more we could appreciate about it.   I may offer additional information in the future, but in the interest of completing the article and moving on to the article on Ezekiel 18, I leave you with these final thoughts.)

(Mark 10:22)  And he was sad at that saying, and went away grieved: for he had great possessions.

Two things we should note about the Lord’s response:

  1. He used the Law as it was meant to be used: to point out sin.  The Law is like a mirror.  The mirror doesn’t clean off dirt.  It shows the dirt.  In this case, the fact that he was unwilling to help the poor demonstrated his disobedience to the command to love his neighbor.  Love is the operative motive in the Kingdom.  This man was shown by the Lord that he missed the mark and was nowhere near obtaining eternal life.  Some tend to think this man was very close to inheriting eternal life.  The reality is, his guilt in one point of the Law indicated he failed in all of it.  He was not nearly the righteous man he thought he was.
  2. He hit the man right where his heart was: in his wallet.  Jesus didn’t need to address the additional four commandments pertaining to man’s relationship with God.  It was already apparent that wealth was this man’s god.  In Mark he went away “grieved” while in Matthew he was “sorrowful.”  Luke gives even more information on the intensity of this man’s sadness where we see he was “very sorrowful.”  He realized at this point he wasn’t as righteous as he thought he was.  He came to Jesus thinking he “had what it took” and left realizing he couldn’t “measure up.”

This is one of the saddest encounters in the gospels.  It was one of the only times someone went away from Jesus worse than when he came.  His love for wealth was stronger than his love for God.  The faith he so desperately needed to put in the Lord was misplaced in his own wealth.  Misplaced faith was a consistent problem in Israel.  The Pharisees loved their religion and the Rich Young Ruler loved his wealth.  The price of placing faith in the Messiah was too great for this man.  He believed he had too much to lose.

It should be obvious by this point what the Lord was doing in his conversation with the Rich Young Ruler.  He wasn’t telling this man that the only thing left to “do” to inherit eternal life was follow the commandments.  Rather, the Lord was using the commandment to reveal the real heart condition of this man.  Every person in every dispensation must come to a place where they recognize their real need.  Every person must come to a place where they believe they are what God says they are:  a lost sinner.  Only then can anyone be in a position to believe Who God is – the Provider of eternal life.

A little while later in Mark 10, we see a striking contrast to the Lord’s encounter with the Rich Young Ruler.  Compare this encounter with the Rich Young Ruler with blind Bartimaeus in Mark 10:46-52.

Rich Young Ruler

Blind Bartimaeus

Regarded Jesus as a “Good Master” – Mark 10:17 Regarded Jesus as “Lord” – Matthew 20:30
He had great possessions – Mark 10:22 He was a beggar – Mark 10:46
He could see but didn’t recognize who Jesus was (Good Master) – Mark 10:17 He was blind but recognized the true identity of Jesus (thou Son of David) – Mark 10:47-48
A rich man unwilling to give up his possessions – Matthew 19:22 A poor man willing to give up everything he had – Mark 10:50
A man who believed he was righteous – Mark 10:20 A man who believed he needed mercy – Mark 10:47-48
Went away from Jesus still blind to eternal life – Mark 10:22 Received his sight and followed Jesus – Mark 10:52
Left Jesus sad – Mark 10:22 Followed Jesus glorifying God- Luke 18:43
Jesus had compassion – Mark 10:21 Jesus had compassion – Matthew 20:34
Did not have faith – wanted to “do” An example of faith – not asked to give up anything

We see two pictures of Israel in these two men.  The Rich Young Ruler is a picture of the state of those who were ruling Israel at that time.  They trusted in their religion and their wealth more than they were willing to trust in the Lord.  Blind Bartimaeus believed Jesus was the Messiah and was willing to give up trusting in anything he owned.  He was at the end of himself.  He was a picture of the little flock who inherited the Kingdom of Heaven.

One man shows how a works-based mind thinks about eternal life.  One shows us how faith operates.  One shows us the unwillingness of Israel’s rulers.  One shows us the heart of the true disciple during the earthly ministry of Christ.

Those who interpret this encounter as the Lord’s endorsement of an Old Testament soul salvation that includes works miss the point entirely.  God’s integrity in His being is unchanged in every dispensation.  While the message changes over time, faith is always the approach.  The Holiness of God demands we have a higher view of His nature and character than man’s performance could possible commend.  The Righteousness of God demands our acceptance by Him is only on the basis of His righteousness.  The Justice of God demands those who stand righteous before Him are present on the basis of His provision.

Praise the Lord for His eternal life paid for on the cross and provided to those who choose to believe His message in time past, the present and the age to come!

Read Full Post »

I know the current series on Old Testament Salvation and The Rich Young Ruler encompasses a lot of posts so far.  I plan to release them all in one article.  In the beginning, I thought this blog would lose readership and subscribers.  In fact, we’ve picked up new subscribers and readership has remained steady.  Thanks for sticking with me through this series.  I received a request to help “catch up” on where we are so far.  So until I post the article, here is a summary of the posts so far on this subject:

The Rich Young Ruler

The Rich Young Ruler Intro – Part 1

The Rich Young Ruler Intro – Part 2

The Rich Young Ruler Intro – Part 3

The Rich Young Ruler Intro – Part 4

Old Testament Salvation and The Rich Young Ruler – Part 1

Old Testament Salvation and The Rich Young Ruler – Part 2

Old Testament Salvation and The Rich Young Ruler – Part 3

Old Testament Salvation and The Rich Young Ruler – Part 4

Old Testament Salvation and The Rich Young Ruler – Part 5

Old Testament Salvation and The Rich Young Ruler – Part 6

Old Testament Salvation and The Rich Young Ruler – Part 7

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »